|
|
| Comments |
 By
yolovoter @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 7:22 PM
|
No working person (or anybody, for that matter) should vote for J. McCain.
In 2005, he voted for tax breaks for corporations that move US jobs offshore http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain.htm
In July 1998, he voted for more vigorous penalties for low level drug offenders; nearly no Californians support such a vote http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain.htm
John McCain actually thinks it's o.k. for creationism to be taught in public schools. http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain.htm
John McCain voted to mandate states to use ethanol in gasoline...though it is more costly than oil, worse for the environment, but great for mid west special interests. Ethanol is one of the reasons Californians pay $3.20 for gas. http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain.htm
John McCain is against unions. http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/John_McCain.htm
John McCain voted YES on authorizing use of military force against Iraq. (Oct 2002). He was one of the evildoers who helped to propel America into the most dishonorable, unamerican, and dirty war since Vietnam.
NO intelligent person would cast a vote for McCain!
|
|
|
|
By
Matt Rexroad @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 7:35 PM
|
So who are you voting for Yolo Voter?
BTW -- who are you to speak for working people?
|
|
|
|
By
yolovoter @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:07 PM
|
Yolovoter's vote is yet to be decided. Will report back when a final decision has been reached. Be patient.
P.S. Yolovoter URGES all intelligent people to vote for ANYBODY (even a republican!) other than Ron Paul. He is racist (http://www.sundriesshack.com/?p=3882), a religious fundamentalist, and like most slobbering idiots thinks evolution didn't happen. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ML8rbbF53ak). Most intelligent people know that if one rejects evolution, one is ipso facto intellectually disabled.
|
|
|
|
By
Matt Rexroad @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:15 PM
|
Yolovoter -- we can't wait. Please let our readers in on your complete analysis.
It would also be great to get your work history so readers can understand how you speak for working America.
|
|
|
|
By
yolovoter @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:26 PM
|
Oh, sure. I'll post my CV on a public website. I'm stupid. No wait...I'm ultra stupid, and would bow to someone who thinks a "work history" should somehow qualify one's political ideas.
Lame. Stupid. Pure idiocy. Please try again when you can actually argue on the merits rather than simply try to distract people from the issues at hand.
|
|
|
|
By
Matt Rexroad @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:35 PM
|
|
You are the one speaking for the "working person". We just want to know what qualifies you to advise them.
|
|
|
|
By
yolovoter @
Saturday, January 19, 2008 8:55 PM
|
|
It would be fallacious to judge an argument on the speaker rather than the argument. Don't you trust people to make up their own ideas based on the information presented? Or do you wish to "spin" by demanding someone's qualifications to argue are solely a result of their education or work history? I think anybody should be qualified to state their opinion, and everyone's opinion should be heard regardless of their employment/unemployment/disemployment. If you are not willing to understand somebody without credentials you think proper, perhaps you shouldn't be serving in government...and i'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who thinks so.
|
|
|
|
By
YoloCalVet @
Sunday, January 20, 2008 3:14 PM
|
|
Something smells fishy or horsey around here.....sounds like the ghost of Mindy Cinderblock.......OOOOoooooooOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can login here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|